Title:
Exploration of
How Water Moves Through Soil
Introduction and Aim:
There are a
few differences between the soils that we have which are sand, topsoil or
potting soil and lastly clay soil. The topsoil has the most nutrients present
in the soil followed by the clay soil and lastly sand. The sand particle is
also larger in size compared to the clay particle. In our project, we are
conducting two different type of experiment. The aim for our first experiment
is to find out which soil allows the least water to pass through after 5
minutes. The aim for the second project is to find out the time taken for the
water that pass through the different type of soil to reach 50 ml.
Experimental Design and Procedure:
Task 1:
(a) Plan
of Experimental Design
There are
some factors that affect how much water a soil is able to hold. One of them is
the soil texture which is the size of the soil particle. Our hypothesis is that
sand will allow most water to pass through it. The question we are
investigating is ‘Which soil is the best at reducing the rate of the water
passing through it?’. The independent variable is the type of soil, while the
dependent variable is the amount of water that is collected in the beaker (the
bottom part of the plastic bottle that is used to collect the water that passed
through the soil) after 5 minutes. The constants in the experiment include the
amount of water poured into the soil, the mass of the soil, the size of the
bottle and the time given to let the water pass through the soil. In this
experiment, we assumed that the soil are of the same mass, the shape of the
bottles are the same and that the fine mesh does not affect water flow.
(b) Procedures
The apparatus
we used were 3 plastic bottle (1.5 litres), 400g of sand, topsoil and clay soil,
3 piece of fine mesh, 3 100ml measuring cylinder, 3 250ml beaker, 1 electronic
balance, 3 stopwatch, 3 hand lens, 3 plastic spoons and a few plastic bags.
Procedure:
1)
Firstly,
cut the bottles into two parts, the bottle top and the beaker.
2)
Using
the plastic spoon, scoop some topsoil and put in the plastic bag.
3)
Put
the plastic bag on the electronic balance to weigh the soil and remove the
excess soil or add in soil till the soil weighs 150g.
4)
Cover
the mouth of the bottle with the fine mesh.
5)
Pour
the topsoil that was weighed, into the bottle top
6) Pour water into the beaker and using
the beaker slowly pour the water into the measuring cylinder till it reach
100ml.
7) After that, start the stopwatch and
pour the water (in the measuring cylinder) onto the topsoil.
8) After 5 minutes, remove the bottle top
and pour the water collected in the bottle beaker into a measuring cylinder.
9) Read the reading using a hand lens and
record it on the paper.
10) Then, repeat step 2 to 9 with sand and
clay soil.
11) Afterwards, repeat step 2 to 10 again.
Task 2:
( a)
Plan of Experiment Design
There
are some factors that affect how much water a soil is able to hold. One of them
is the soil texture which is the size of the soil particle. Our hypothesis of
the experiment of the experiment is that when the water is poured in the clay
soil, the water will take the most time to reach 50ml among the other 2 soils.
The question we are investigating is ‘Which soil is the best at reducing the
amount of water passing through it’. The independent variable is the type of
soil, while the dependent variable is the amount of time taken for the water
that passed through the soil to reached 50ml. The constants in the experiment
include the amount of water poured into the soil, the mass of the soil, the
amount of water collected in the bottle top (the bottom part of the plastic
bottle that is used to collect the water that passed through the soil). In this
experiment, we assumed that the soil are of the same mass, the shape of the
bottles are the same and that the fine mesh does not affect water flow.
( b)
Procedures
The apparatus
we used were 3 plastic bottle (1.5 litres), 400g of sand, topsoil and clay
soil, 3 piece of fine mesh, 3 100ml measuring cylinder, 3 250ml beaker, 1
electronic balance, 3 stopwatch, 3 hand lens, 3 plastic spoons, a few plastic
bags and a marker
Procedure:
1)
Pour
some water into a beaker and using the beaker; slowly pour the water into the
measuring cylinder till it reach 50ml.
2)
Pour
the water in the measuring cylinder in the bottle beaker, and use a marker to
mark where the water stops.
3)
Using
the plastic spoon, scoop some topsoil and put it in the plastic bag.
4)
Put
the plastic bag on the electronic balance to weigh the topsoil and remove the
excess topsoil or add in topsoil till the topsoil weighs 120g. (120g was used
because there was a lack of dry soil as the soil took too long to dry)
5)
Cover
the mouth of the bottle with the fine mesh.
6)
Pour
the 120g of topsoil into the bottle top.
7) Pour some water into a beaker and
using the beaker slowly pour the water into the measuring cylinder till it
reached 100ml.
8) After that, start the stopwatch and
pour the water onto the topsoil.
9) Once the water in the bottle beaker
reached the marking, stop the stopwatch and record the timing.
10) Repeat step 1 to 9 with sand and clay
soil.
11) Afterwards, repeat step 1 to 10 again.
Task 1 Results
Type of soil used
|
Amount of water collected at 1st trial/ml
|
Amount of water collected at 2nd trial/ml
|
Average/ml
|
Topsoil
|
33.0
|
36.0
|
34.5
|
Clay
|
46.0
|
47.0
|
46.5
|
Sand
|
50.0
|
58.0
|
54.0
|
Task 2 Results
Type of soil used
|
Time taken for 1st
trial/s
|
Time taken for 2nd
trial/s
|
Average/s
|
Topsoil
|
26.0
|
18.0
|
22.0
|
Clay
|
19.0
|
13.0
|
16.0
|
Sand
|
18.0
|
13.0
|
15.5
|
Analysis and Discussion of Results
From task 1, the soil that stored the most amount of water is the topsoil as the average amount of water collected using topsoil was the lowest among the rest of the types of soil after 5 minutes. This shows that topsoil is most effective for storing water as after 5 minutes, most of the water would have flowed through the sand and the remaining water would the ones stored in the sand. For task 2, the soil that reduced the rate of water flow the most was the topsoil as it took on average the longest time for water to pass through it. This shows that topsoil is most effective for reducing the rate of water flow as for water to reach the 50 ml mark, it would take quite a short period of time and thus most of the water would still have been flowing through the soil rather than be stored in them. As a result, the rate of the water flow could be deduced from this experiment which showed that topsoil was the most effective at reducing the rate of water flow. From this analysis, we deduced that topsoil is the finest soil as it stored the most amount of water as well reduced the rate of water the most and sand is the largest grade of soil as it not only allowed most water to pass through it, it also reduced the rate of water flow the worst on average.
Conclusion
The conclusion to make is that topsoil is the best soil to use for the problem as it not only reduces the rate of flooding, it reduces the amount of flooding as well according to our data collated which is the most beneficial to use in the situation.
Areas for Further Study and Research
The suggestions to make the experiment more accurate and reliable is that we can repeat the experiment 2 more times, use instruments to try and make each set-up identical to improve accuracy and reliability, use techniques and practice to reduce carelessness and errors before and during the experiment and check, scrutinize and make sure that the conditions of the surroundings as well as other factors do not interfere or affect the experiment’s overall reliability.
We have also found out soil retents water mainly due to its pores. Its pores are affected by the grade of the soil particle which varies from rough to fine. The bigger the soil particles are, the bigger the pores are and the more the water can pass through it and vice versa.
(Did not take
note of the websites when during research)
Duty List & Acknowledgement
Group consist
of Sheng Jia (Group Leader), Jia Hao, Darren, Yeh Jou, Ari
Sheng Jia was
in-charge of the clay soil set-up for both task. Darren and Ari was in-charge
of the topsoil set-up for both task. Jia Hao and Yeh Jou was in-charge of the
sand set-up for both task







Well described experiment except that there are no hypothesis in this experiment.
ReplyDeleteThough the independent and dependent variables are stated in the table. There is no constant stated in this experiment.
Please ensure the pictures are able to seen before posting it up.
Marks :16/18